Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2023 Month : July-August Volume : 12 Issue : 4 Page : AO01 - AO03 Full Version

Variations in the Terminal Branches of Brachial Artery- A Cadaveric Cross-sectional Study


DR Raghavendra, Smita Minz, Gangadhar Chaganti, Sravanthi Repalle, M Krishnaiah
1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Shridevi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, Tumkur, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana, India. 5. Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Suryapet, Telangana, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
DR Raghavendra,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Shridevi Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dr.raghavendra18@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Brachial Artery (BA) begins as a continuation of axillary artery at the distal border of teres major, it appears in the cubital fossa, where it ends at the level of the neck of radius by dividing into radial and ulnar arteries. Common Interosseous Artery (CIA) is the largest branch of Ulnar Artery (UA) and arises in the cubital fossa. The terminal branches of BA at elbow are clinically important since they are responsible for the arterial supply to the forearm and hand. These arteries may get damaged during fractures of the elbow.

Aim: To know the variations in the terminal branches of the BA at elbow.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional cadaveric study was done on 40 upper limbs from embalmed adult human cadavers in the Department of Anatomy, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India, from August 2017 to August 2019. Dissection of BA in arm and cubital fossa was carried out according to Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy. The distance of division of BA into radial and UA and distance of origin of CIA from Inter Epicondylar Line (IEL) of humerus were noted.

Results: In present study, 20 right-side specimens and 20 left-side specimens were obtained. Among 20 cadavers used, 16 were male cadavers and four were female cadavers. The mean distance (D1) of normal division of BA into the Radial Artery (RA) and UA at elbow was 2.8 cm Below the imaginary line joining the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus (IEL). The mean distance (D2) of normal origin of CIA was 6.8 cm below the imaginary line joining the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus (IEL). CIA arising from the UA was present in 37 specimens (92.5%) and in the rest three specimens Anterior Interosseous Artery (AIA) and Posterior Interosseous Artery (PIA) arose directly from the UA.

Conclusion: The present study has found variations in site of division of terminal branches of the BA at elbow in three specimens.
Keywords : Common interosseous artery, Cubital fossa, Elbow, Radial artery
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/58542.2897

Date of Submission: Jun 18, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 18, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHOD:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 10, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 14, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

Cubital fossa is a triangular fossa at the front of the elbow. The base of the fossa is a line drawn between the two epicondyles of the humerus, the medial border is formed by pronator teres muscle and lateral border is formed by the brachioradialis muscle. The floor is formed by the brachialis and supinator muscles. The median nerve, BA, and tendon of biceps enter the cubital fossa. Here, the BA divides into radial and ulnar arteries. The RA leaves the fossa at the apex, the UA passes deep to pronator teres (1). In cubital fossa the bicipital aponeurosis covers and protects the median nerve and BA, and it separates them from the median cubital vein (2).

The BA normally divides into the radial and ulnar arteries at the level of the neck of the radius in the cubital fossa. The smaller RA passes inferolaterally between brachioradialis and flexor carpi radialis to reach the anterior surface of the distal end of the radius between the tendons of these muscles. Here, the artery can be felt readily (radial pulse) against the bone. The UA passes inferomedially deep to the median nerve and the muscles arising from the medial epicondyle of the humerus and the coronoid process of the ulna. It descends vertically with ulnar nerve to pierce the deep fascia just proximal to the flexor retinaculum, between the tendons of flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor digitorum superficialis. The CIA is the principal branch of the UA in the forearm. It passes to the upper border of the interosseous membrane. Here, it divides into anterior and posterior interosseous arteries. The Posterior Interosseous Artery (PIA) passes above the interosseous membrane to the back of the forearm. The Anterior Interosseous Artery (AIA) descends on the front of the interosseous membrane and pierces the interosseous membrane at the upper border of pronator quadratus to enter the back of the forearm (1). The cubital fossa contains the following structures, enumerated from the medial to the lateral side: the median nerve, the bifurcation of the BA into the ulnar and radial arteries, the tendon of the biceps muscle, and the radial nerve and its deep branch (3).

Sometimes the BA divides at a more proximal level than usual. In other cases, the UA passes superficial to the flexor muscles within the superficial fascia (2). These variations must be kept in mind when performing venesections (incisions into a vein) at the elbow. If an aberrant artery is mistaken for a vein and certain drugs are injected into it, the result can be disastrous resulting in partial or total loss of the hand (2).

The arteries of the upper limb can be damaged by penetrating wounds or may require ligation in amputation operations. A clinician must know where the arteries of the upper limb can be palpated or compressed in an emergency (3). There are only few studies have done to determine the distance of origin of radial and UA from a fixed line (4),(5),(6). The authors did not found studies, which evaluated the distance of origin of CIA from IEL. The results of the present study may be useful in various surgical procedures in the cubital fossa at elbow for surgeons, orthopaedicians, vascular surgeons, physicians and clinicians.

Hence, present study was conducted to note the variations in the terminal branches of the BA at elbow. Present study is the part of a larger project and part of the study is already published (7).
 
 
Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional cadaveric study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, Telangana, India, over a period of two years from August 2017 to August 2019.

Inclusion criteria: Upper limbs specimen from embalmed adult human cadavers of both sexes, in good condition without external cut marks were included.

Exclusion criteria: All damaged specimens were excluded.

Sample size calculation: A total of 40 upper limb specimens fixed in 10% formalin solution were procured from the Department of Anatomy.

Study Procedure

Dissection of BA in arm and cubital fossa was carried out according to Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy (1). According to Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy (1), skin was incised from the cubital fossa. BA was identified and cleaned. The Radial Artery (RA), Ulnar Artery (UA), CIA, AIA, PIA were identified and cleaned. The distance of division of BA into radial and UA from IEL of humerus (D1) was noted (Table/Fig 1). The distance of origin of CIA from IEL of humerus (D2) was noted (Table/Fig 2). A vernier caliper was used to take the measurements from an imaginary transverse line at elbow, joining the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus (IEL). Photograph was taken for the specimen by digital camera (Samsung A10S).

Statistical Analysis

The mean, median, mode, standard deviation was calculated using calculator.net software.
 
 
Results

In present study, 20 right-side specimens and 20 left-side specimens were obtained. Among 20 cadavers used, 16 were male cadavers and four were female cadavers. CIA arising from the UA was present in 37(92.5%) specimens. CIA was absent in 3 (7.5%) specimens and in such cases AIA and PIA arose directly from the UA (Table/Fig 3).

The mean distance (D1) of normal division of BA into the RA and UA at elbow was 2.8±0.6 cm Below the imaginary line joining the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus (IEL) of the humerus. The median value was 3 cm. The mode value was 2 cm. The range value was 2 cm with minimum value of 2 cm and maximum value of 4 cm. The mean distance (D2) of normal origin of CIA was 6.8±1 cm below the imaginary line joining the medial and lateral epicondyles of the humerus (IEL). The median value was 6.8 cm. The mode value was 6 cm. The range value was 3.2 cm with minimum value of 5 cm and maximum value of 8.2 cm (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).
 
 
Discussion

In present study, variations were found in 3 (7.5%) specimens and in such cases AIA and PIA arose directly from the UA. BA divides into radial and UA. Datta AK mentions, RA begins in the cubital fossa about 1 cm below the bend of elbow at the level of neck of radius and just medial to the tendon of biceps brachii (8).

In the present study, the mean distance of normal division of BA into the RA and UA at elbow was 2.8 cm below the IEL of humerus. The median value was 3 cm. The mode value was 2 cm. The range value was 2 cm with minimum value of 2 cm and maximum value of 4 cm. Kadel M mentions in his study on 53 upper limb specimens, the origin of RA was 34.5±6.31 mm below the level of the intercondylar line of the humerus (9). Nasr AY found in his study on 100 upper limb specimens, mean distance of the normal origin of the RA, as one of the two terminal branches of BA was 3.87±0.95 cm in men and 3.65±0.85 cm in women below the intercondylar line (4). Present study findings are comparable to the findings of Nasr AY and Kadel M [4,9]. In the present study, CIA arising from the UA was present in 37 specimens (92.5%). CIA was absent in three specimens (7.5%) and in such cases AIA and PIA arose directly from the UA. Talalwah WA et al., mentions in their study on 34 adult cadavers, the CIA present in 67.6%, whereas it is congenital absence in 32.4% (10). Present study confirms such variation of the absence of CIA.

Sawant SP and Dope SA reported a variation in the termination of a BA in right upper limb of a 70-year-old male cadaver, where, trifurcation of BA into the radial, ulnar and CIA was observed (11). Sargon M and Cellik HH reported that, the CIA, a branch of ulnar, originated at the level of the humeral intercondylar line from the BA, instead originating from distal part of cubital fossa (12). Satheeshnaik K and Lokanadham S reported, an unusual origin of an arterial trunk from RA in the right upper limb giving rise to CIA (13). Babaee S and Baazm M reported the origin of CIA from RA (14). Present study has no such findings. The authors observed AIA and PIA arose directly from the UA. The distance of origin of radial, ulnar and common interosseous arteries from IEL of humerus is useful during surgical procedures. These arteries may get damaged during fractures of the elbow.

Limitation(s)

The study was conducted in single Institution with small sample size.
 
 
Conclusion

In present study, variation was found in 7.5% specimen. CIA was absent in 3 (7.5%) specimens and in such cases AIA and PIA arose directly from the UA. The present study provides valuable information of distance of normal division of BA into radial and ulnar arteries and distance of origin of CIA from the IEL of the humerus at elbow, which may be useful during surgical procedures at elbow region such as fracture fixation. Future studies with large sample size should be conducted in different population, to know the variations in different ethnic groups.
 
 
Acknowledgement

The authors will be thankful to the management and principal of Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally for providing guidance and support.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Romanes GJ. Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy: Volume 1, Upper and lower limbs. 15th ed. New York: Oxford medical Publications; 2010:67-83.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Moore KL. Clinically oriented anatomy.3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1992:547-81.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Snell RS. Clinical anatomy by regions. 9thed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer / Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012:374-428.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Nasr AY. The radial artery and its variations: anatomical study and clinical implications. Folia Morphol. 2012;71(4):252-62.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Clarke E, Olszewska A, Zarzecki MP, Przybycien´ W, Dubrowski A, Depukat P, et al. Case report of the brachial artery trifurcation: An anatomical study and concise literature review. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2022;27:100198. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2022.100198#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
6.
Deepa TK, John MK. An anatomical study of variations in termination of brachial artery, with its embryological basis and clinical significance. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences. 2016;5(3):85-89.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Raghavendra DR, Minz S, Repalle S, Chaganti G, Krishnaiah M. Study of variations in the course of brachial artery: a cadaveric study. Int J Anat Res. 2022;10(2):8372-76. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2022.145#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
8.
Datta AK. Essentials of human anatomy: superior and inferior extremities, Part III. 4th ed. Kolkata: Current books international; 2009;72.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Kadel M. Anatomic variation in the origin and course of radial artery: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Journal of Nepal Medical Association. 2019;57(220):420-23. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.4609#doi# ?pmid?32335653#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Talalwah WA, Getachew D, Soames R. The morphology of common interosseous artery and its clinical significance. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2015;3(3b):1126-31.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Sawant SP, Dope SA. Variant termination of the brachial artery and its clinical importance. Indian Journal of Anatomy. 2013;2(1):47-50.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Sargon M, Cellik HH. Proximal origins of radial and common interosseous arteries. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1994;69(4):406-09.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Satheeshnaik K, Lokanadham S. Unusual origin of unilateral arterial trunk from radial artery, case report. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2013;5(4):82-84.   [Google Scholar]
14.
Babaee S, Baazm M. A rare variation in origin of common interosseous artery: a review of anatomical studies and case report. Anatomical Sciences. 2017;14(2):61-64.  [Google Scholar]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *