Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2023 Month : July-August Volume : 12 Issue : 4 Page : RO18 - RO21 Full Version

Paediatric Head Injury: Concordance between CT Findings and GCS Scores- A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital


Umamaheshwari K Basavaraju, Vinaya Manohara Gowda, Vishal S Dharpur, Sanjana Satish, Prateek Parmeshwar Ugran
1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Radiology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Sanjana Satish,
No.257, 1st main, 1st cross, Ganganagar Layout, Bangalore-560032, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: sanjana.satish95@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Computed Tomography (CT) remains the mainstay in the detection of traumatic brain injuries in children just as in the adult population. However, unnecessary and inadvertent use of CT in minor and less significant head injuries exposes children to harmful ionising radiation and subsequently increases the lifetime cancer risk. So, there is a need to use CT judiciously in cases of minor head injuries. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) can provide a comprehensive framework for proper stratification of neural impairment and head injury severity.

Aim: To assess the concordance between CT scan findings and GCS scores in paediatric patients with acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of paediatric head injury cases who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Mysore Medical College, Karnataka, India. from January 2021 to December 2021. The head CT of 110 patients was reviewed. Demographic details, mode of accident, CT findings, and GCS scores were collected from hospital records. Descriptive statistics were used and results were expressed in terms of frequency and percentages.

Results: Out of 110 patients (mean age: 9.17±3.02 years) reviewed, males were 78 (71%) and females were 32 (29%). Road traffic accident was found to be the most common cause, i.e., in 71 patients (64.5%). The most common CT scan finding was fracture as seen in 12 cases. Out of 110 patients, 94 had mild injury according to GCS scores, 12 had a moderate head injury and four had a severe head injury. As the GCS scores decreased, the percentage of positive findings on CT increased.

Conclusion: Percentage of positive CT findings was higher in the moderate and severe head injury category, where the role of CT scans in acute settings becomes valuable.
Keywords : Computed tomography, Minor head injury, Glasgow coma scale, Radiation risk
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/63246.2905

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 20, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 07, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 21, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

There is a high incidence of head injury in the paediatric population. Statistically, road traffic accidents contributed to about 2% of deaths in India in the year 2005, out of which more than half the cases were that of head injury and more than one-fourth of the cases occurred in children under the age group of 15 years (1),(2). As a result of external physical force, neuropathological changes occur in the brain, resulting in TBI (3). Just like in adults, TBI in children includes injuries to the scalp, skull, or brain, but the pathophysiology and the management in children differ from those of adults (4).

Rather than relying on clinical markers for detecting Intracranial Brain Injury (IBI) in children, sensitive imaging techniques like CT are needed for detecting early IBI or to rule out any significant brain injury (5). CT is regarded as the first line of diagnosis in the early detection of traumatic intracranial haemorrhages. On imaging, the various patterns of head injury in paediatric population include: scalp swelling and haematoma, fractures of the bony calvaria, extradural and subdural haemorrhages, diffuse axonal injuries, cortical contusions, head trauma secondary to abuse or assault or those caused during birth (6).

It is not just the excessive use of CT for mild head injuries that is of concern but the exposure of children to ionising radiation that can triple their risk for leukaemia and brain tumours in later life (7). Most of the times, the treating doctors in an emergency send the paediatric patients of trauma to CT scans based on external soft tissue injuries and medico-legal issues. However, CT scan appears normal in the majority of this population. Therefore, a study was needed to evaluate the relationship between CT head findings and GCS scores in paediatric patients with acute TBI.
 
 
Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Mysore Medical College from January 2021 to December 2021. Ethical committee clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee, Mysore Medical College. (ECR/134/Inst/KA/2013/RR-19).

A total of 130 patients (<15 years of age) with a history of head injury were referred to the Department for NCCT head. Out of which 20 cases were excluded due to lack of availability of clinical data, incomplete clinical data, history of previous seizure disorder, or known case of a congenital brain malformation. The head CT of 110 patients was reviewed.

Inclusion criteria: Computed Tomography (CT) scans of children below the age of 15 years, with a history of head injury, referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Mysore medical college, for NCCT head, within <24 hours of head injury.

Exclusion criteria: Children with a history of prior seizure disorder, doubtful history, Central Nervous System (CNS) malformations, or any previous neurosurgery were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Non contrast CT scans of head were done using “Siemens Somatom 128 slice dual CT scanner” with low dose protocol. CT images of the patients were retrieved from Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and were examined by two experienced radiologists to look for signs of any acute traumatic intracranial pathology like the presence of pneumocephalus, intracranial bleeds, extra and subdural haemorrhages,midline shift and fractures etc. Demographic details, mode of accident, CT scan findings and GCS scores (7) were collected from hospital records.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used and results were expressed in terms of frequency, mean±SD and percentages.
 
 
Results

The age group ranged from one month to 15 years, with mean age group 9.17±3.02 years (Table/Fig 1). Out of 110 patients reviewed, males were 78 (71%) and females were 32 (29%).

Road traffic accident was found to be the most common cause of trauma in 71 (64.5%) patients (Table/Fig 2). The most common CT scan finding was fractures as seen in 12 (60%) cases (Table/Fig 3).

Out of 110 patients, 94 had mild injury according to GCS scores, 12 had moderate head injury and four had severe head injury (Table/Fig 4).

Amongst the patients with mild head injury, eight cases had positive CT findings, eight out of 12 cases with moderate head injury had positive findings on CT, and all cases of severe head injury had positive CT findings (Table/Fig 4).

The NCCT findings and GCS scores of the patients with mild, moderate and severe brain injuries have been shown in (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9).
 
 
Discussion

The TBI in children is often associated with important morbidity and mortality and is one of the most common indications for hospitalisation among children. Timely detection and interventions are fundamental for favourable neurological outcomes in this population.

A study conducted by Satapathy MC et al., showed males outnumbered females with a male: female ratio 2.19:1, with reference to head injury among paediatric patients (8), a finding consistent with this study. Sharma M et al., found that the most common paediatric age group predisposed to trauma was 6-12 years (9). In a study conducted by Bhargava P et al., fall from height (56.5%) followed by road traffic accident (21%) was the most common mode of injury in paediatric population (10). The study conducted by Satapathy MC et al., showed falls as the most common cause in children less than five year, road traffic accident in 5-15 years of age as the most common mode of injury (8). However, in this study, the common mode of injury was found to be road traffic accidents followed by fall from height.

Amongst the 94 patients evaluated with mild head injury scores on GCS, eight had positive CT findings (8.5%), eight out of 12 cases (66%) with moderate head injury had positive findings on CT, and all cases of severe head injury had positive CT findings (100%). A study conducted by Gómez PA et al., showed that abnormal CT findings were significantly higher in patients with a GCS of 13 than in those scoring 14 or 15 (11). A study conducted by Mohanty SK et al., showed that in patients who maintained GCS scores of atleast 13, CT scan did not have any prognostic or therapeutic implications (12).

The most common CT finding in this study was fractures (60%). Similar findings were also seen in the study conducted by Tabrizi S et al., which showed fractures to be the most common CT finding followed by subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracranial haemorrhage (13). The study conducted by Madaan P et al., showed fractures to be the most common finding followed by contusions and extradural haemorrhage (14). Study conducted by Ng SM et al., contusion 35% was most common CT finding followed by depressed skull fracture 26% and EDH 14% (15). According to Fundarò C et al., 20EDH was found in 20% and depressed skull fracture and SDH in 14% of cases (16).

In this study, majority of children with mild GCS scores had negative findings on CT. A population-based cohort study on paediatric emergency care named Paediatric Emergency Care Research Network (PECARN), which is the largest study on the subject provides objectively defined clinically important signs to help identify significant brain injuries. Accordingly, in the setting of acute head trauma (<24 hours), a child ≥2 years with a GCS of 15 and a normal mental status, with no signs of basilar skull fractures, no loss of consciousness, no vomiting, no severe injury mechanism, or severe headaches would be considered to have a very low risk of clinically important TBI (estimated risk of clinically important TBI of <0.05%) CT evaluation for acute head trauma can be avoided for children who meet these criteria (17).

Limitation(s)

Non haemorrhagic contusions, the diffuse axonal injury which are devasting injuries cannot always be picked up on CT. Therefore, children with less Glasgow coma scale and normal CT should be further evaluated with MRI. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, it was done on basis of limited descriptive variables. The smaller sample size was another limitation of this study.
 
 
Conclusion

In this study, it was established that the percentage of positive CT findings were higher in moderate and severe head injury category, where role of CT scans in acute setting becomes valuable. However, in contrast, the mild head injury patients had a lesser percentage of positive CT findings and hence CT can be avoided in acute settings in cases of non severe head injuries with no loss of consciousness, or neurological deficits. This significantly brings down the unnecessary exposure of children to the harmful effects of ionising radiation.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Hsiao M, Malhotra A, Thakur JS, Sheth JK, Nathens AB, Dhingra N, et al; Million Death Study Collaborators. Road traffic injury mortality and its mechanisms in India: nationally representative mortality survey of 1.1 million homes. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e002621.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002621#doi#?pmid?23959748#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Gomes M, Begum R, Sati P, Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Kumar R, et al. Nationwide mortality studies to quantify causes of death: relevant lessons from India’s Million Death Study. Health Affairs. 2017;36(11):1887-95.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0635#doi#?pmid?29137507#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Khellaf A, Khan DZ, Helmy A. Recent advances in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology. 2019;266(11):2878-89.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09541-4#doi#?pmid?31563989#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Araki T, Yokota H, Morita A. Pediatric traumatic brain injury: characteristic features, diagnosis, and management. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica. 2017;57(2):82-93.?doi?https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0191#doi#?pmid?28111406#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Andrade FP, Montoro Neto R, Oliveira R, Loures G, Flessak L, Gross R, et al. Pediatric minor head trauma: do cranial CT scans change the therapeutic approach? Clinics. 2016;71(10):606-10.?doi?https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(10)09#doi#?pmid?27759850#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
O’Brien Sr WT, Caré MM, Leach JL. Pediatric emergencies: imaging of pediatric head trauma. InSeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2018;39(5):495-514. WB Saunders.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2018.01.007#doi#?pmid?30244763#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Ghizoni E, Fraga AD, Baracat EC, Joaquim AF, Fraga GP, Rizoli S, et al. Indications for head computed tomography in children with mild traumatic brain injury. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de CirurgiƵes. 2013;40(6):515-19.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912013000600016#doi#?pmid?24573632#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Satapathy MC, Dash D, Mishra SS, Tripathy SR, Nath PC, Jena SP. Spectrum and outcome of traumatic brain injury in children< 15 years: A tertiary level experience in India. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2016;6(1):16.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.177359#doi#?pmid?27051617#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Sharma M, Lahoti BK, Khandelwal G, Mathur RK, Sharma SS, Laddha A. Epidemiological trends of pediatric trauma: A single-center study of 791 patients. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2011;16(3):88.?doi?https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.83484#doi#?pmid?21897566#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Bhargava P, Singh R, Prakash B, Sinha R. Pediatric head injury: An epidemiological study. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences. 2011;6(1):97.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Gómez PA, Lobato RD, Ortega JM, De La Cruz J. Mild head injury: differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 1996;10(5):453-60.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1080/02688699647078#doi#?pmid?8922703#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Mohanty SK, Thompson W, Rakower S. Are CT scans for head injury patients always necessary? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1991;31(6):801-05.?doi?https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199106000-00010#doi#?pmid?2056543#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Tabrizi S, Zafar E, Rafiei H. A cohort retrospective study on computed tomography scan among pediatric minor head trauma patients. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2021;29:50-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2021.01.005?doi?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2021.01.005#doi#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
14.
Madaan P, Agrawal D, Gupta D, Kumar A, Jauhari P, Chakrabarty B, et al. Clinicoepidemiologic profile of pediatric traumatic brain injury: experience of a tertiary care hospital from northern India. Journal of Child Neurology. 2020;35(14):970-74. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073820944040#doi#?pmid?32748676#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Ng SM, Toh EM, Sherrington CA. Clinical predictors of abnormal computed tomography scans in paediatric head injury. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2002;38(4):388-92. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00012.x#doi#?pmid?12174002#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Fundarò C, Caldarelli M, Monaco S, Cota F, Giorgio V, Filoni S, et al. Brain CT scan for pediatric minor accidental head injury. An Italian experience and review of literature. Child’s Nervous System. 2012;28(7):1063-68. ?doi?https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1717-9#doi#?pmid?22349902#pmid#   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria; for head trauma in children for head trauma in children, 2014. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/ 3083021/ Narrative/.  [Google Scholar]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *