Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2021 Month : March-April Volume : 10 Issue : 2 Page : AO44 - AO47 Full Version

A Cross-sectional Study on Morphology and Position of Pterion in Andhra Pradesh Population


Mutyalapati Venkata Ramulu, Pitapurapu Sasidhar, Somesh M Shivaprasad, Ravitheja Eluru
1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor, Department of Anatomy, Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra, Pradesh, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ravitheja Eluru,
Plot No-6, SBI Colony, Bondilipuram, Near Overhead Water Tank, Srikakulam-532001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: elururavitheja@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Pterion is the important surgical landmark in temporal fossa, deeper to which vital areas of the brain are located. Injuries are common at this suture area due to confluence of multiple bones which are relatively slender and weak. Since the variations in morphology of the pterion is common, thorough knowledge of its location, types and subtypes, helps health professionals of varied speciality to confidently explore this area and perform the necessary interventions.

Aim: This study is aimed to determine the prevalence of different types of pterion, position of pterion, and compare the morphological variance between the right and left side among adult human skulls in Andhra Pradesh.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study on human skull bones was conducted in Apollo institute of medical sciences and research, Chittoor, and Great eastern medical school and hospital, Srikakulam of Andhra Pradesh state in India from June 2020-August 2020. The study was conducted on 54 adult dried human skulls with well-defined sutures. The pterions of both sides of the skulls were keenly observed and studied for the type and subtypes of Pterions based on Murphy’s classification. The position of pterion was measured from Frontozygomatic Suture (FZS) and Midpoint of Zygomatic Arch (MZA) with Vernier callipers. Data was analysed with descriptive statistics and also compared with earlier research works.

Results: Sphenoparietal 89 (82.4%) was the commonly observed pterion type in the present study, frontotemporal pterion was not found. Pterion was positioned at a Mean distance of 3.16±0.48 cm and 3.20±0.50 cm from frontozygomatic arch on right and left side, respectively. From MZA the pterion was present at 3.70±0.35 cm and 3.78±0.35 cm on right and left side, respectively.

Conclusion: The present study reveals variations in sutural morphology pattern and position of pterion in the skulls oftentimes. Notable difference was observed while comparing the position of pteria with other country population. Cognizance of such variations would help the radiologists, neurosurgeons and forensic experts to diagnose opine and treat judiciously.
Keywords : Fontanelle, Middle meningeal artery, Suture, Sutural bones
DOI and Others : 10.7860/IJARS/2021/47963:2650

Date of Submission: Nov 30, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Dec 23, 2020
Date of Acceptance: Jan 17, 2021
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
•
 
INTRODUCTION

Pterion word was coined by Broca in 1875, derived from ‘Pteron’ which means ‘wing’. The floor of the temporal fossa is formed by the frontal and parietal bones superiorly and the greater wing of the sphenoid and squamous part of the temporal bone inferiorly. All four bones of one side meet at a roughly H-shaped sutural junction termed the pterion. The pterion is usually positioned 4.0 cm above the zygomatic arch and 3.5 cm behind the FZS. It corresponds to the site of the anterolateral (sphenoidal) fontanelle of the neonatal skull, which closes during the third month after birth (1). Presence of fontanelle in the fetal head helps for the molding during its passage through the birth canal as well as the rapid growth of brain during infancy period. The pterion is known to be the weakest part of the skull; therefore it is most important sutural landmark in craniofacial region and has clinical significance (2).

Neurosurgeons operate through this reference landmark to approach anterior branch of middle meningeal artery, lateral (sylvian) cerebral fissure, insula, Broca’s motor speech area to the left, pathologies of optic nerve, orbit, sphenoidal ridge and for the anterior circulation aneurysms and tumors. Pterion burr hole operation helps in evacuating and treating extradural haematomas (3). Determination of age of the skull by archaeology and forensic experts can be done by studying pterion. Sutural bones at pterion, detected on X-rays should not be confused as fracture by radiologists (3). Pterion presents as various structural patterns that can mislead the clinicians during diagnosis of the lateral skull fractures in emergency situations (4).

As the variations in the morphological pattern and position of pterion is common, study of pterion gains importance as a valuable reference landmark to various health professionals (4). Therefore, this study of pterion on adult human skulls of Andhra Pradesh population aims to determine the prevalence of types of pterion and compare between right and left sides of skull. Also, to determine the Pterion position and compare between right and left sides of skull. Further the differences of Pteria type and position is compared among Indian and overseas population.

 
 
Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed on 54 adult human dry skulls of both sexes collected from the osteology museum, Department of Anatomy, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor and Great Eastern Medical School and Hospital, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh state, India. The study was done over a period of three months from June 2020-August 2020. As the study was conducted on anonymous human skull bones, ethical clearance was not considered.

Sample size: The number of samples studied was 54 skulls. Sample size was calculated based on previous studies with expected proportion of 89%, absolute precision of 10% and desired confidence level of 95%.

Inclusion criteria: Adult human skulls with well-defined pterion sutures were considered for the study (adult skulls were determined by observing the third molar teeth eruption).

Exclusion criteria: Deformed, damaged and skulls with obliterated sutures were not included in the study. Skulls of new born, infants and children were excluded in this study.

Methods: The pteria morphology were studied and categorised based on Murphy’s classification into four types (Table/Fig 1).

Sphenoparietal (sphenoid and parietal bones are in direct contact), Frontotemporal (frontal and temporal bones are in direct contact), Stellate (all the four bones meet at a single point to form star shaped suture) and Epipteric (sutural bones are present in the Pterion suture) (Table/Fig 1) (2).

The position of pterion was determined by measuring the pterion Centre Point (CP) distance from FZS and MZA using vernier callipers (Table/Fig 2). To minimise the errors in measurements, average of two readings was considered.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The observational findings were tabulated in excel sheet and analysed. The descriptive statistical data like mean, percentage and standard deviation was derived using Statistical Package For The Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0.
 
 
Results

a. Percentage occurrence of types of pterion: In the current study, the following types of pterion were observed Sphenoparietal, Epipteric and Stellate (Table/Fig 3). Majority of the pterions 89 (82.4%) were sphenoparietal, the second common type was epipteric 17 (15.7%) and least were stellate 2 (1.85%) FZStype. The present study did not find the Frontotemporal type of pterion (Table/Fig 4).

b. Presentation: About 42 (78%) of the skulls studied have shown bilateral symmetry (same type of pterion on right and left side), but in the rest, there were different pterions on right and left sides of the skull. Sphenoparietal pterion were more commonly observed on right side than on left side, on the contrary epipteric were more common on left side than on the right side (Table/Fig 5).

c. Position of pterion: The center of pterion (CP) from FZS on right side was 3.16±0.48 cm and on left side was 3.20±0.50 cm. From MZA the (CP) was at distance of 3.7±0.35 cm on right side and 3.78±0.35 cm on left side (Table/Fig 6).
 
 
Discussion

The current study reveals the similarity of occurrence of sphenoparietal (82.4%) type of pterion with the findings of Satpute C and Wahane A, (82.9%) of Maharashtra region. Frontotemporal type of pterion was not found in present study which is in accordance with Sumathy G et al., and Shenoy V et al., of Tamil Nadu state. The epipteric pterion (15.7%) occurrence is same as that of study by Sucharitha A and Bajpe R, (16%) of Karnataka state. The stellate pterion (1.85%) occurrence was consistent with findings of Shenoy V et al., of Tamil Nadu and Manjunath KY and Thomas IM of Karnataka (Table/Fig 7) (3),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13).

Altogether the present study findings of Pterion types are close by to the findings of earlier studies done on south Indian population. The incidence of sphenoparietal pterion (82.4%) in present study is adjacent to that by Matsmura G et al., (79.1%) of Japan and Chaijaroonkhanarak W et al., (87.27%) of Thailand. The findings of epipteric (15.7%) and stellate (1.85%) variety are similar to that of Matsmura G et al., (17.7% and 0.6%, respectively) (Table/Fig 8) (2),(4),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18).

The findings of current study correlate with the study by Matsmura G et al., of Japan (15).

In the present study, the position of pterion (CP) from FZS and MZA is similar on right and left side of the skull, which is in agreement with earlier studies conducted in India (Table/Fig 9) (3),(6),(9),(19),(20),(21). When compared among different ethnic groups, the pterion position of present study is consistent with Nigerians (Table/Fig 10) (16),(17),(22).

Limitation(s)

The current study was done on human skulls to determine the pterion morphology and position. Sexual dimorphism of pterion was not considered in this study. Hence there is scope for further research, to compare the pterion types and position between male and female skulls.
 
 
Conclusion

The variations in the pterion morphology are commonly observed. Sphenoparietal type of pterion is the most commonly observed pterion while there are no frontotemporal pterion observed in the present study. Minimal variation of position of pterion was observed on right and left side. There is similarity among south Indian population pterion morphology and position, but difference was noted from that of north Indian population. Notable difference was observed while comparing the position of pteria with other country population. In conclusion, the key knowledge of similarities and differences found in the present study will help the radiologists, forensic experts, neurosurgeons, anthropologists and other health professionals in perfect diagnosis, ethnic comparisons, postmortem reporting, surgical interventions and treatment of ailments of anatomical structures lying deeper to this cardinal surgical landmark of skull.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Black S. External Skull. In: Susan Standring, editor. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 41st ed. Churchill-Livingstone: Elsevier; 2016. Pp. 419.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Murphy T. The pterion in the Australian aborigine. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1956;14(2):225-44.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Sucharitha A, Bajpe R. Study of anatomic position of Pterion in dry human skulls in Karnataka. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(9B):3272-76.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Chaijaroonkhanarak W, Woraputtaporn W, Prajanay P, Amarttayakong P, Khamanarong K, Pannangrong W, et al. Classification and incidence of pterion patterns of Thai skulls. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(4):1239-42.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Manjunath KY, Thomas IM. Pterion variants and epipteric ossicles in South Indian skulls. J Anat Soc India. 1993;42(2):85-94.   [Google Scholar]
6.
Zalawadia DA, Vadgama DJ, Ruparelia DS, Patel DS, Patel DSV. Morphometric study of pterion in dry skull of Gujarat region. NJIRM. 2010;1(4):25-29.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Shenoy V, Saraswathi P, Siva T, Jagadeesh D. A study on sutural morphology and anatomical position of pterion. Inter J of Current Research and Review. 2012;4(9):67-75.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Praba AMA, Venkatramaniah C. Morphometric study of different types of Pterion and it’s relation with middle meningeal artery in dry skulls of Tamil Nadu. J of Pharma and Biomed Sci. 2012;21(21):01-04.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Seema, Mahajan A. Pterion formation in north Indian population: An Anatomico Clinical study. Int. J. Morpholo. 2014;32(4):1444-48.   [Google Scholar]
10.
Gindha GS, Mir NS, Agarwal R. Morphometric study of pterion in dry human skull bone in north Indian population. Human Biology Review. 2017;6(1):01-09.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Satpute C, Wahane A. To study the morphology of pterion in dry human skull in Vidarbha region. Inter J of Science and Research. 2015;4(1):2171-73.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Sowmya S, Meenakshi B, Ranganath P. Study of pterion: Its clinical and morphological aspects. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2017;4(2):247-49.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Sumathy G, Chandrakala B, Rajalakshmi A, Ramyashree S. Morphological analysis of location of pterion in human dry skull. International Journal of Current Research. 2017;9(12):62523-25.   [Google Scholar]
14.
Saxena SK, Jain SP, Chowdhary DS. A comparative study of pterion formation and its variations in the skulls of Nigerians and Indians. Anthropol Anz. 1988;46:75-82.   [Google Scholar]
15.
Matsumura G, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G. Pterion and epipteric bones in Japanese adults and fetuses, with special reference to their formation and variations. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1991;66(5):462-71.   [Google Scholar]
16.
Oguz O, Sanli SG, Bozkir MG, Soames RW. The pterion in Turkish male skulls. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(3):220-24.   [Google Scholar]
17.
Mwachaka PM, Hassanali J, Odula P. Sutural morphology of the pterion and asterion among adult Kenyans. Braz J Morphol Sci. 2009;26:4-7.   [Google Scholar]
18.
Murrieta-Angulo S, Tejada-Valdivia CA, Arriola-Guillén LE. Morphological study of Pterion in skulls of corpses of the Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences (Ditanfor), Lima - Peru 2018. Rev Mex Med Forense. 2019;4(2):12-23.   [Google Scholar]
19.
Prasad H, Bezbaruah NK, Mishra A, Mishra PP. Morphometric analysis of pterion: A clinic- anatomical study in north Indian dry skulls. Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science. 2015;5(5):201-05.   [Google Scholar]
20.
Nayak G, Mohanty BB, Das SR. Morphometric study of pterion and its clinical significance. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(10):142-44.   [Google Scholar]
21.
Rosli AB. Comparison of location and morphological of pterion in Indian and Malaysian skulls. Research J Pharm and Tech. 2018;11(8):3638-40. Doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00670.4   [Google Scholar]
22.
Eboh DEO, Obaroefe M. Morphometric study of pterion in dry human skull bones of Nigerians. Int J Morphol. 2014;32(1):208-13.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8] [Table/Fig-9] [Table/Fig-10]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *