Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case report

Year :2014 Month : September-October Volume : 3 Issue : 3 Page : 10 - 12 Full Version

Jejunal Diverticula with Perforation- A Case Report


Dinesh Hn, Jagadish Kumar Cd, Veeresh M Annigeri, Sabayya, Supritha Jt
1. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, MMCRI, Karnataka, India. 2. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, MMCRI, Mysore Medical College, Karnataka, India. 3. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, MMCRI, Mysore Medical College, Karnataka, India. 4. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, MMCRI, Mysore Medical College, Karnataka, India. 5. Intern, Department of Surgery, MMCRI, Mysore Medical College, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jagadish Kumar CD,
#1188,1st Floor, 3rd Cross, 4th Main, Aravindanagar,
Mysore, Karnataka 570023, India.
Phone : 7259759549, 7676785101
E-mail: drjagadishkumarcd@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Jejunal diverticula with perforation is very rare. Incidence of Jejunal diverticula on enteroclysis is 2.0–2.3% and on autopsy it is 0.06–4.6%. Incidence of perforation in Jejunal diverticula is 2.3-6.4%. Pathologically it is pulsion type of pseudo diverticula occuring along the mesenteric border of the intestine, where the blood vessels pierce the muscularis layer causing weak areas to develop. These out-pouchings contain mucosa and submucosa only hence perforates easily. 74 year old male patient presents with pain in abdomen since 1 day. Patient was toxic and per abdomen examination shows diffuse tenderness+, guarding+, rigidity+, abdomen distention +, Bowel sounds absent. Erect X-ray abdomen showed air under the diaphragm. Emergency Laparotomy performed and multiple Jejunal diverticula with a perforation in mesenteric border of Jejunum was noted. Segmental Resection and end to end anastamosis was done. Postoperative period was uneventful. Jejunal diverticula with perforation is very rare and mostly an incidental finding during Laparotomy. Segmental Resection and anastamosis is the treatment of choice.
Keywords : Emergency laparotomy, Jejunal diverticula, Pseudodiverticula, Perforation, Resection and Anastomosis
DOI and Others :
 
Case Report

CASE PRESENTATAION

74 year old male patient presents with pain in abdomen since 1 day. Patient looks toxic in appearance pulse 88/min, BP 100/60, dehydration+, temperature 99.8 F. Per abdomen examination showed diffuse tenderness+, guarding+, rigidity+, abdomen distention +, Bowel sounds absent. Erect X ray abdomen showed air under the diaphragm (Table/Fig 1).

Emergency Laparotomy was performed and multiple Jejunal diverticula with a perforation in mesenteric border of jejunum noted (Table/Fig 2). Segmental Resection and end to end anastamosis was done. Postoperative period was uneventful.
 
 
Discussion

Jejunal diverticula incidence on enteroclysis is 2.0–2.3% and on autopsy it is 0.06–4.6% (1). Incidence of perforation in Jejunal diverticula is 2.3-6.4% (2). Pathologically it is a pulsion type of pseudo diverticula occur along the mesenteric border of the intestine, where blood vessels pierce the muscularis layer causing weak areas to develop. These out-pouchings contain mucosa and submucosa only, hence perforates easily. Jejunal diverticulum was first described by Somerling in 1794 and later by Astley Cooper in 1809. Gordinier and Shil performed the first operation for diverticula in 1906 (3),(4).

It commonly affects elderly males (5).

Currently etiopathological hypothesis focuses on abnormalities in the smooth muscle or myenteric plexus. Microscopic examination of Jejunal diverticula specimens showed three changes (1) Fibrosis and decreased numbers of normal muscle cells, consistent with progressive systemic sclerosis. (2) Fibrosis and degenerated smooth muscle cells, suggestive of a visceral myopathy. (3) Neuronal and axonal degeneration indicative of visceral neuropathy. Any of these abnormalities could lead to distorted smooth muscle contractions of the affected small bowel generating increased intraluminal pressure. This results in herniation of mucosa and submucosa through the weakest mesenteric site of the bowel wall where vasa recta pierce the muscularis layer (6).

The Jejunoileal diverticulosis is usually multiple, more frequently located in the jejunum and in the terminal ileum and probably due to the larger size of the vasa recta at these areas (7). The most common part of the small bowel to be affected by diverticula is the Jejunum (85%), ileum (15%). Isolated jejunal diverticulosis coexists with diverticula of the esophagus (2%), of the duodenum (26%) and of the colon (35%) (7).

Jejunal diverticula is usually asymptomatic. It can present with vague and chronic nonspecific symptoms, mainly post- prandial, epigastric cramping pain, bloating or abdominal full- ness. Edwards described a symptom triad observed in these patients as ‘flatulent dyspepsia’ (epigastric pain, abdominal discomfort, flatulence one or two hours after meals) (8). It can also be associated with iron deficiency and megaloblastic anemia due to malabsorpion, steatorrhea, and vitamin c deficit (9). Malabsorpion could be explained by the non synchronous peristaltic movement of the bowel, dilation of the diverticula, stasis of intestinal content and bacterial overgrowth (10),(11),(12),(14).

Complications such as obstruction, hemorrhage, diverticulitis and perforation are seen in 10%-30% patients (11),(12),(14).

Peritonitis caused by perforated jejunal diverticula can be localized and self-limiting because the diverticula are at the mesenteric border of the bowel and readily allow the small bowel mesentery to wall them off (14).

Jejunal diverticulosis with perforation on plain abdominal X- ray series demonstrates pneumoperitoneum. Computed to- mography may show focal areas of out-pouching of the mes- enteric side of the bowel with pneumoperitoneum (15).

Novac et al (16) presented a case series of perforated diver- ticulitis treated conservatively with temporary interruption of the enteral nutrition, gastrointestinal relief with a nasogastric tube and to the administration of empirical, wide-spectrum antibiotics (17). Exploratory Laparotomy and resection of af- fected intestinal segment with primary anastamosis is the treatment of choice. The extent of the Segmental resection depends on the length of the bowel affected by diverticula. If diverticula involve a long intestinal segment, as commonly happens, the resection should be limited to the perforated or inflamed intestinal segment in order to avoid a short bowel syndrome. Other surgical approaches such as the invagination of the diverticula, primary closure of the perforation and omental patch and diverticulectomy should be avoided since they have high mortality rates (18).
 
 
Conclusion

Jejunal diverticulosis with perforation is very rare and most of the time an incidental finding during Laparotomy. Segmental Resection and anastamosis is the treatment of choice.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Zager JS, Garbus JE, Shaw JP, C ohen MG, and Garber SM: Jejunal diverticulosis: a rare entity with multiple presentations, a series of cases. Dig Surg 2000, 17:643-45.
2.
Makris K, Tsiotos GG, Stafyla V, Sakorafas GH. Small intestinal nonmeckelian diverticulosis: clinical review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009; 43:201–07
3.
Longo WE, Vernava AM: Clinical implications of jejunoileal diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1992, 35:381-88.
4.
Williams R, Davidson DD, Serota AL, Wilson SE: Surgical problems of diverticula of the small bowel. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981, 152:621-26.
5.
Lempinen M, Salmela K, Kemppainen E: Jejunal diverticulosis: a potentially dangerous entity. Scand J Gastroenterology 2004, 39:905-09.
6.
Woubet TK, Josef F, Jens H, Michael B, Johann H. Complicated small bowel diverticulosis : A case report and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterology .2007; 13:2240-42.
7.
Ross C B, Richards WO, Sharp KW, Bertram PD, Schaper PW: Diverticular diseases of the jejunum and its complications. Am Surg 1990, 56:319-24.
8.
Rodriguez HE, Ziaudin MF, Quiros ED, Brown AM, Podbielski FS: Jejunal diverticulosis and gastrointestinal bleeding.J C Gastrenterol 2001, 33:412-14.
9.
Edwards HC: Diverticula of the Small Intestine. B J of Radiology 1949, 22:437-42.
10.
Drude RB Jr, Finkelman D, Davis WD, Ferrante WA: Malabsorption in jejunal diverticulosis treated with resection of the diverticula. Dig Dis Sci 1980, 25:802-06.
11.
Akhrass R, Yaffe MB, Fischer C , Ponsky J, Shuck JM: Smallbowel diverticulosis: Perceptions and reality. J Am Coll Surg 1997, 184:383-88.
12.
Wilcox RD, Shatney C H: Surgical implications of jejunal diverticula. South Med J 1988, 81:1386-91.
13.
Singh VV, Toskes PP: Small bowel bacterial overgrowth: Presentation, Diagnosis and treatment. Curr Gastrenterol Rep. 2003, 5:365-72.
14.
Herrington JL., Jr Perforation of acquired diverticula of the jejunum and ileum: Analysis of reported cases. Surgery. 1962; 51:426–33.
15.
Benya EC , Ghahremani GC , Brosnan JJ: Diverticulitis of the jejunum. Clinical and radiological features. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991, 16:24-28.
16.
Novac JS, Tobias J, Barkin JS: Non surgical management of acute jejunal diverticulitis: A review. Am J Gastrenterol. 1997, 92:1929-31.
17.
Wilcox RD, Shatney C H: Surgical significance of acquired ileal diverticulosis. Am Surg. 1990, 56:222-25.
18.
Englund R, Jensen M: Acquired diverticulosis of the small intestine: case reports and literature review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1986, 56:51-54.  [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *