Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2025 Month : November-December Volume : 14 Issue : 6 Page : RO01 - RO05 Full Version

Functional Outcomes and Complications of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation using Precontoured Locking Plates for Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Prospective Interventional Study


Yash Siddharth Parikh, Dhwanil D Joshi, Harshil R Barot, Niranjan Tadvi, Paresh Rathwa
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 4. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Yash Siddharth Parikh,
20, Netaji Society, Near Muktanand, Karelibaug, Vadodara-390018, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: parikhyash08@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Clavicle fractures are common injuries, with displaced midshaft fractures traditionally managed conservatively. However, recent evidence suggests that operative treatment may offer superior outcomes.

Aim: To evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) using precontoured locking plates for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted at the Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan from April 2021 to January 2023. Thirty five patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures underwent ORIF using precontoured locking plates. Demographic variables assessed included age, sex, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, and associated injuries. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score at six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests for comparing functional scores, and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis for multiple time-point comparisons. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The majority of patients were male (n=29, 82.86%) with a mean age of 38.7 years. All fractures achieved union, with no cases of non-union. The mean Constant-Murley score improved from 73.8±7.2 at six weeks to 89.7±3.9 at six months (p<0.001). At six months, excellent functional recovery was observed in the majority of patients. Complications occurred in three patients, including hardware irritation in one patient (2.86%) and superficial infection in one patient (2.86%). The majority of patients (48.57%) returned to work within 6-8 weeks.

Conclusion: ORIF using precontoured locking plates for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures provides excellent functional outcomes with a low complication rate.
Keywords : Constant-Murley score, Robinson classification, Shoulder function, Surgical timing, Union rates
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2025/79253.3068

Date of Submission: Mar 10, 2025
Date of Peer Review: May 01, 2025
Date of Acceptance: Sep 22, 2025
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 01, 2025
• Manual Googling: Sep 09, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Sep 20, 2025 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9
 
INTRODUCTION

Clavicle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered in orthopaedic practice, accounting for approximately 5-10% of all fractures and 35-44% of shoulder girdle injuries (1),(2). The incidence of clavicle fractures in the general population is reported to be 30-60 per 100,000 annually, with the highest incidence observed in young males. Recent data from the United States indicate that sports-related injuries account for 45-50% of all clavicle fractures, with an annual incidence rate of 18.72 per 100,000 persons at risk (3).

Midshaft clavicle fractures represent approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures, with displaced fractures accounting for a significant proportion of these injuries (4). The prevalence of midshaft clavicle fractures shows a bimodal distribution, with peaks in males younger than 25 years (due to sports injuries) and patients older than 55 years (due to falls), and males are affected approximately twice as often as females (5).

Historically, conservative treatment with figure-of-eight bandages or slings was the standard of care for midshaft clavicle fractures, based on early reports suggesting non-union rates of less than 1% (6). However, recent literature has challenged this traditional approach to displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Contemporary studies have reported non-union rates of 7-15% following conservative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, with unsatisfactory functional outcomes in 15-31% of patients (7),(8).

The shift toward operative management has been driven by several factors, including improved understanding of the biomechanical consequences of clavicle shortening, the development of specialised implants, and evidence from randomised controlled trials demonstrating superior outcomes with surgical fixation (9). Modern studies indicate that surgical treatment leads to significantly improved functional outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, earlier return to activities, and lower rates of non-union compared with conservative treatment (10),(11).

Precontoured locking plates have gained popularity as they offer several theoretical advantages over traditional reconstruction plates, including improved anatomical fit, reduced need for intraoperative contouring, lower profile design, and potentially fewer complications (12). The biomechanical advantages of precontoured plates include better load distribution, reduced stress concentration, and superior stability compared to traditional plates (13),(14).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of ORIF using precontoured locking plates for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.
 
 
Material and Methods

This prospective interventional, single-institution study was conducted at the Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, from April 2021 to January 2023, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC No: PGISP/IEC/042021/02).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study included patients aged over 18 years with closed, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Robinson type 2B) (3), displacement >2 cm or shortening >2 cm, comminution with >3 fragments, no medical contraindications for surgery, and with written consent. Exclusion criteria were patients aged under 18 years, open fractures, pathological fractures, active infection at the operative site, medical contraindications to surgery, undisplaced fractures, and previous clavicle fractures.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated using the formula: n=(Zα/2)2 ×(PQ)/E2. Where P=90% (expected good outcome rate) (15), Q=10%, Zα/2=1.96 (95% confidence level), E=0.12 (12% allowable error). n=(1.96) 2×0.9×0.1/(0.12) 2=30. Considering 15% loss to follow-up, final sample size=35 patients.

Study Procedure

Data were collected for demographic variables, including age, sex, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, associated injuries, time to surgery, duration of surgery, plate specifications, complications, and functional outcomes. Patients were assessed with a detailed history regarding mode of injury and severity of trauma. Clinical examination included evaluation of deformity, swelling, ecchymosis, and neurovascular status. Associated injuries were documented. Standard anteroposterior and 30-degree cephalad tilt radiographs were obtained to assess fracture configuration and comminution. Fractures were classified using Robinson’s classification system (4).

Surgical technique: All surgeries were performed under general anaesthesia with the patient in a beach-chair position. A horizontal incision was made over the fracture site, and the fracture was reduced and fixed with a precontoured locking clavicle plate. The time interval between injury and surgery was recorded for analysis.

Outcome assessment: Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley score (16) at six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Return to work was evaluated and documented. Early complications (within six weeks) included wound infection, hardware irritation, and wound dehiscence. Late complications (after six weeks) included non-union, implant failure, and persistent pain. The Constant-Murley scoring system grades functional outcomes as: Excellent (90-100 points), Good (80-89 points), Moderate (65-79 points), and Poor (<65 points).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using EPI software version 7.0 and Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean±standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies/percentages for categorical variables. Paired t-test was used to compare functional scores at different time points. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis was performed to compare mean scores across multiple time points. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 
 
Results

Demographics: Thirty-five patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 38.7 years (range 18-65 years). Twenty-nine patients (82.86%) were male, and six (17.14%) were female. The oldest patient was 65 years, and the youngest was 18 years. The maximum number of patients belonged to the age groups 18-27 years (n=4, 11.43%) and 48-57 years (n=9, 25.71%), showing a bimodal age distribution. Fracture classification and associated injuries are shown in (Table/Fig 1). The left-side was involved in 18 patients (51.43%) and the right-side in 17 patients (48.57%). Road traffic accidents were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 29 patients (82.86%), while six patients (17.14%) sustained fractures due to falls (Table/Fig 1).

Surgical details: The time interval between injury and surgery ranged from 1 to 25 days, with the majority of patients (n=22, 62.85%) undergoing surgery within one to three days of trauma (Table/Fig 2). The mean duration of surgery was 74.3±10.2 minutes (range 60-100 minutes). Plate specifications used were as follows: 6-hole plates in 2 patients (5.71%), 7-hole plates in 16 patients (45.71%), 8-hole plates in 12 patients (34.28%), and 9-hole plates in 5 patients (14.28%).

Union rates: All patients (100%) achieved clinical union by 12 weeks (3 months) and radiological union by 24 weeks (6 months). No cases of non-union, delayed union, or malunion were observed (Table/Fig 3).

Functional outcomes: According to the Constant-Murley functional outcome grade, the progressive improvement observed from moderate-good outcome at 6 weeks to excellent outcome in 82.85% of patients at 6 month (Table/Fig 4). The mean±SD Constant-Murley scores at six weeks, three months, and six months were 73.8±7.2, 85.2±5.8, and 89.7±3.9, respectively, showing progressive improvement. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in Constant-Murley scores across the three time points (F=89.23, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 5). Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis showed significant improvements between all time-point comparisons: six weeks to three months (mean difference=11.4, p<0.001), three months to six months (mean difference=4.5, p<0.001), and six weeks to six months (mean difference=15.9, p<0.001) (Table/Fig 6). Seventeen patients (48.57%) returned to work within 6-8 weeks, seven patients (20%) within 9-11 weeks, and 11 patients (31.42%) within 12-15 weeks.

Complications: A total of three patients (8.57%) experienced complications: superficial infection in one patient (2.86%), hypertrophic scar in one patient (2.86%), and hardware irritation in one patient (2.86%). No cases of non-union, implant failure, plate breakage, screw loosening, delayed union, or neurovascular injury were observed in this study (Table/Fig 7).

Case illustration: A 32-year-old male presented with a left displaced comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture (Robinson type 2B1b) following a road traffic accident. The preoperative radiograph (Table/Fig 8) demonstrated displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with varying degrees of comminution and shortening. ORIF was performed using an 8-hole precontoured plate. The postoperative radiograph confirmed anatomical reduction and stable fixation with the precontoured plate (Table/Fig 9). Follow-up radiographs at six months showed complete union with callus formation in all cases (Table/Fig 10). Clinical examination at the final follow-up demonstrated excellent range of motion and functional recovery in the majority of patients (Table/Fig 11).
 
 
Discussion

The present study demonstrates excellent functional outcomes, with a 100% union rate following ORIF of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using precontoured locking plates. The mean Constant-Murley score was 89.7±3.9 at six months, and the majority of patients achieved excellent functional recovery, which compares favourably with the published literature (16),(17). Reisch T et al., in their study of 100 patients treated with anatomical pre-contoured locking plates, reported a mean Constant-Murley score of 93.5±6.2, with 85.4% achieving excellent outcomes (16). Similarly, Fang et al., in their propensity score–matched study of 106 patients comparing anatomically pre-contoured versus reconstruction plates, found that 90.6% of ALCP patients achieved full range of motion compared to 88.7% in the RLCP group (p=0.751), demonstrating comparable functional outcomes between the two plate types, though they observed significantly higher implant deformity rates in the RLCP group (11.3% vs 0%, p=0.012) (17).

The shift from conservative to operative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has been one of the most significant changes in orthopaedic practice over the past two decades. Our findings support the current evidence favouring surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, particularly in young, active patients (18).

The superior outcomes in our study may be attributed to meticulous surgical technique, appropriate patient selection, and a structured rehabilitation protocol. The precontoured design eliminated the need for intraoperative plate contouring, potentially reducing surgical time and preserving plate integrity (19),(20). The biomechanical advantages of precontoured plates include better load distribution and reduced stress concentration compared to traditional plates (21),(22).

The complete union rate achieved in our study is consistent with recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews showing superior union rates with operative treatment compared to conservative management (14),(23). Frima H et al., in their comprehensive review, reported that surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures results in union rates of 94-100%, significantly higher than the 77-86% union rates seen with conservative treatment (14). McKee RC et al., in their meta-analysis of randomised trials, found a non-union rate of 15.1% with conservative treatment versus 2.2% with operative treatment (relative risk 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.34), and a malunion rate of 31.3% versus 4.1%, respectively (23).

The low complication rate in our study compares favourably with recent systematic reviews reporting 15-25% complications with plate fixation (24). The absence of non-union, implant failure, or neurovascular injury in our study highlights the safety of this technique when performed with careful soft-tissue handling and appropriate patient selection.

The functional outcomes in our study are consistent with contemporary literature. Recent studies have reported excellent outcomes ranging from 76.7% to 85.4% using various plate configurations. The mean Constant-Murley score of 89.7 at six months in our study is comparable to the 89.23-93.48 range reported in recent meta-analyses.

In the present study, an early return to work was observed, with 48.57% of patients resuming activities within 6-8 weeks, demonstrating the advantage of stable fixation in allowing early mobilisation. This finding aligns with the documented benefits of operative treatment in facilitating earlier return to function and activities (18),(25).

Our study findings are similar to existing literature, showing that precontoured plates provide equivalent or superior stability compared to traditional reconstruction plates while maintaining a lower profile. Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated that precontoured plates offer better load distribution and reduced stress shielding, potentially contributing to improved healing and reduced complications (22),(26).

The present study adds to the growing evidence supporting the use of precontoured locking plates for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, demonstrating that appropriately selected patients can achieve excellent functional outcomes with high union rates and low complication rates.

Limitation(s)

The study has several limitations, including a relatively small sample size, short follow-up period (6 months), single-center design, absence of a control group for comparison with conservative treatment, and potential selection bias in patient recruitment. Future multicenter randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and provide more robust evidence for clinical decision-making.
 
 
Conclusion

ORIF using precontoured locking plates for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in the present study demonstrated excellent functional outcomes with 100% union rates and low complication rates. The technique enabled early return to work, with 48.57% of patients resuming activities within 6-8 weeks. The majority of patients (82.85%) achieved excellent functional outcomes at six months follow-up. This study supports the use of precontoured locking plates as an effective treatment option for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in appropriately selected patients.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(300):127-32.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
2.
Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-56.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Van Tassel DC, Owens BD, Wolf JM. Incidence of clavicle fractures in sports: Analysis of the NEISS database. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(1):83-86.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(3):476-84.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
5.
Kihlström C, Möller M, Lönn K, Wolf O. Clavicle fractures: Epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2,422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):82.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Neer CS 2nd. Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA. 1960;172:1006-11.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Matsubara Y, Nakamura Y, Sasashige Y, Yokoya S, Adachi N. Long-term conservative treatment outcomes for midshaft clavicle fractures: A 10-to-30-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):952.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Han X, Zhang X, Tan J, Zhang Y. Comprehensive comparison between conservative therapy and surgical management for completely displaced and comminuted mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Int Orthop. 2024;48(8):2087-94.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Robinson CM, Goudie EB, Murray IR, Jenkins PJ, Ahktar MA, Read EO, et al. Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(17):1576-84.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Biz C, Pozzuoli A. An institutional standardised protocol for the treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: Conservative or surgical management for active patients? Healthcare. 2023;11(13):1883.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Smeeing DPJ, van der Ven DJC, Hietbrink F, Timmers TK, van Heijl M, Kruyt MC, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for midshaft clavicle fractures in patients aged 16 years and older: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(8):1937-45.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Moverley R, Little N, Gulihar A, Singh B. Current concepts in the management of clavicle fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 1):S25-S30.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Goswami T, Markert R, Anderson CG, Sundaram SS, Crosby LA. Biomechanical evaluation of a pre-contoured clavicle plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(5):815-18.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Frima H, Houwert RM, Sommer C. Clavicle fractures in adults; current concepts. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(2):309-15.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Altamimi SA, McKee MD. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical Technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90Suppl 2 Pt 1:01-08.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Reisch T, Camenzind RS, Fuhrer R, Riede U, Helmy N. The first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate for clavicular midshaft fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):4.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Fang CX, Liu R, Yee DKH, Chau J, Lau TW, Chan R, et al. Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes, complications, and implant removals in anatomically pre-contoured clavicle plates versus reconstruction plates - a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study of 106 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):413.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Hoogervorst P, van Schie P, van den Bekerom MJP. Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(6):374-80.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
VanBeek C, Boselli KJ, Cadet ER, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. Precontoured plating of clavicle fractures: Decreased hardware-related complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(12):3337-43.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Huang JI, Toogood P, Chen MR, Wilber JH, Cooperman DR. Clavicular anatomy and the applicability of precontoured plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(10):2260-65.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Marie C. A prospective study of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Injury. 2019;50(8):1376-82.   [Google Scholar]
22.
Zhang F, Chen F, Qi Y, Qian Z, Ni S, Zhong Z, et al. Finite element analysis of dual small plate fixation and single plate fixation for treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):148.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):675-84.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Wijdicks FJ, Van der Meijden OA, Millett PJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(5):617-25.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
25.
Robertson C, Celestre P, Mahar A, Schwartz A. Reconstruction plates for stabilization of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: Differences between nonlocked and locked plates in two different positions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):204-09.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
26.
Zhang B, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:27.  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *