Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2023 Month : September-October Volume : 12 Issue : 5 Page : SO32 - SO34 Full Version

Outcome of Limberg Flap Reconstruction in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Retrospective Study


S Pradeep, V Kalaivani, K Anupama Pujar, Bhavyadeep Korrapati
1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, SDUMC, Kolar, Karnataka, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
K Anupama Pujar,
No 1165, 4th Main, 5th Block, HBR Layout, Bangalore, Karnataka-560043, India.
E-mail: anupamapujar@rediffmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Pilonidal Sinus Disease (PSD) is a tract or cavity commonly seen in the sacrococcygeal region, usually containing a tuft of hair. It is mostly observed in drivers who have excessive hair in the natal cleft region. Although several surgical procedures have been described for the management of PSD, none have been universally accepted as the gold standard. Limberg flap reconstruction, following wide excision, offers a tension-free repair using a well-vascularised flap. This technique flattens the natal cleft, avoiding a midline scar and reducing the chance of recurrence.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of Limberg flap reconstruction in sacrococcygeal PSD.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The study duration was six years, from January 2011 to January 2017. The study included a total of 40 patients aged between 15-70 years, with Tezel type III sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease (PND), who underwent the Limberg flap procedure. Data was collected and analysed from January to June 2021. Outcome measures such as duration of hospital stay, time required to return to work, and procedure-related complications associated with procedure were analysed and entered into an Excel sheet.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 18.02±6.87 years. Out of the 40 patients, 4 (10%) developed complications. Superficial wound infection was observed in 1 (2.5%) patient, which healed within two weeks. Minimal flap necrosis was observed in 2 (5%) patients, who underwent debridement and dressings on an outpatient basis. The wounds healed within three to four weeks. Recurrence was reported in 1 (2.5%) patient. The mean time to return to work was 18.7±4.88 days.

Conclusion: Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal PSD is a simple technique with a lower complication rate, faster return to normal activity, and a low recurrence rate.
Keywords : Limberg flap, Pilonidal sinus disease, Rhomboid flap, Rotational flap
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/60931.2930

Date of Submission: Oct 27, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 13, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 05, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 02, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 29, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7
 
INTRODUCTION

Pilonidal Sinus Disease (PSD) is a tract commonly observed in the sacrococcygeal region, typically containing a tuft of hair, and it is frequently seen in drivers. It is characterised by recurrent infection and chronic inflammation (1). The term “Pilonidal sinus” originates from Latin, meaning a nest of hair (2),(3), and the maleto-female ratio is 2:1 (4). The incidence of PSD is reported to be 26 per 100,000 population (5). Risk factors include poor hygiene, obesity, and unhealthy behaviours such as prolonged sitting, particularly in drivers who have hair in the natal cleft (1). Mayo first described PSD as a congenital condition in 1833, but later Karydakis postulated that the etiology is attributed to a high quantity of hair, local trauma, and susceptibility to infection (2). Pilonidal sinuses can also occur in other areas such as the axilla, suprapubic region, periumbilical zone, and interdigital cleft in the hands of barbers (4). PSD can significantly impact daily activities and work ability due to recurrent infections and high recurrence rates, affecting the individual’s Quality of Life (QoL). Treatment options range from wide excision or tract opening (20%-40%) to more complex procedures such as Z-plasty, Bascom, Karydakis, and Limberg Flap (2).

In 1946, Limberg introduced the Limberg flap procedure, which involves making a rhomboid-shaped incision encompassing all sinuses followed by excision. The defect is then reconstructed using a wide, well-vascularized rotational flap (6),(7). This technique helps flatten the natal cleft, preventing hair accumulation and avoiding a midline scar. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of Limberg flap reconstruction in sacrococcygeal PSD.
 
 
Material and Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The study duration was six years, from January 2011 to January 2017. The study analysed the records of all patients with sacrococcygeal PND who underwent Limberg flap reconstruction. Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) under the letter number (MSRMC/EC/AP-02/05-2020). Data were collected and analysed from January 2021 to June 2021.

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients with Tezel type III (8) sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus who were treated with Limberg flap reconstruction and were between the ages of 15 and 70 years.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus presenting with abscess (Tezel type IV, V) were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients were identified using a computer-generated search through the medical records department. The medical records were reviewed for age, gender, presenting complaints, site of occurrence, single/multiple sinuses, and outcome measures such as duration of hospital stay, time required to return to work, and procedure-related complications, including recurrence. Patients underwent a wide rhomboid-shaped excision involving all sinuses (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4). A rhomboid-shaped rotational flap was then created and sutured into the defect with a suction drain in-situ (Table/Fig 5). The drain was removed between the 3rd and 7th postoperative day when the drain fluid was less than 10 mL. Sutures were removed between 10 and 15 days.

Statistical Analysis

All variables relevant to the study were entered into an Excel spreadsheet. Descriptive statistics, including Mean±Standard Deviation (SD) for continuous variables and percentages/proportions for categorical variables, were calculated.
 
 
Results

Data from a total of 62 patients were collected, but complete data was available for 40 patients who were included in the study. Among them, 31 (77.5%) were males and the remaining were females. The age of the patients ranged from 19 to 55 years, with a mean age of 18.02±6.87 years. All patients presented with single or multiple discharging sinuses in the sacrococcygeal region, and they were classified as type III PND according to the Tezel E classification (8). Multiple sinuses were observed in six patients. The average length of hospital stay was 5.16 days.

Out of the 40 patients, 4 (10%) developed complications. Superficial wound infection was observed in 1 (2.5%) patient, which healed within two weeks. Minimal flap necrosis was seen in 2 (5%) patients, who required debridement and dressings on an outpatient basis. The wounds healed within three to four weeks. Recurrence was reported in 1 (2.5%) patient after one year. The mean time to return to work was 18.7±4.88 days, ranging from 15 to 30 days.
 
 
Discussion

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is an acquired condition typically observed in the midline of young hirsute men. The estimated incidence is 26 per 100,000 population (9),(10). Although sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is considered a benign disease, it is associated with morbidity and recurrence, significantly affecting the QoL. The most commonly affected age group is 16 to 26 years, with infection typically starting in early adulthood (18-40 years) (11). Alvandipour M et al. and Bali I et al. reported a mean age of patients as 29 and 24 years, respectively (12),(13). In a study by Gurer A et al., 95% of patients were males (14). In the present study, the mean age was 18.02±6.87 years, and 31 (77.5%) patients were males.

In a study by Kumar S et al., the average hospital stay was five days (15), while in the study by Boshnaq S et al., it ranged from four to seven days (16). In the present study, the average hospital stay was five days, which is consistent with the above studies. Ates et al. found that the Limberg flap was superior to the Karydakis flap in terms of hospital stay (17), but they did not find a statistically significant difference in return to normal activity time. However, in a study by Tokac M et al., there was no significant difference in hospital stay, but patients who underwent the Limberg flap procedure had a shorter return to work time compared to those who underwent the Karydakis flap (18). In the present study, the mean time to return to work was 18.7±4.88 days (range 15 to 30 days).

Complications following Limberg flap reconstruction were reported as 12.5% in a study by Singh PK et al., and 14.8% in a study by Alvandipour M et al., (3),(12). In the present study, complications occurred in 10% of patients. The distribution of complications and a comparison with other related studies are shown in (Table/Fig 6) (19),(20),(21),(22).

Arslan K et al., found that patients undergoing Karydakis flap had significantly higher rates of seroma formation (19.8% vs 5.2%), wound dehiscence (15.4% vs 2.1%), and flap maceration (11.0% vs 1.0%) compared to patients undergoing Limberg flap reconstruction (23). The author also noted that the appearance of seroma, hematoma, or wound infection in the early postoperative period increases the risk of recurrence. Aithal SK et al., reported that out of 30 patients, three developed complex wound infections, three experienced minor flap edema, and one had flap tip discharge. All of these complications healed over time (6).

One of the main challenges in treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is its tendency to recur, with recurrences often occurring within the first three years (18). In the present study, recurrence was observed in one patient, one year after surgery, accounting for 2.5% of the patients, which is comparable to findings from other studies. Ertan T et al., reported a recurrence rate of 2% in the Limberg flap group compared to a recurrence rate of 12% in the primary closure group (24). Studies have shown that the recurrence rate is low (0.5%-7%) with rhomboid excision and Limberg flap reconstruction [19,21,25,26]. Due to the low recurrence rate, Limberg flap reconstruction is widely accepted for recurrent and complicated pilonidal sinus (25). Unalp et al. reported a statistically significantly higher rate of recurrence in the V-Y flap group (27). Alvandipour M et al., reported a recurrence rate of zero in the Limberg flap group and 2.7% in the Karydakis flap group (12).

Limitation(s)

It was a retrospective study with a small sample size.
 
 
Conclusion

Though there are various reconstruction techniques available for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PND) after wide excision, Limberg flap reconstruction is a simple technique that has a lower complication rate, faster return to normal activity, and a low recurrence rate. This makes it a better surgical option, as per the study.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):13720.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Kalwaniya DS. Our experience of limberg flap in treatment of pilonidal sinus: A case study of 100 patients operated in a tertiary care centre in North India. International Journal of Medical Science and Diagnosis Research (IJMSDR). 2019;3(9):07-10. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.32553/IJMSDR/v3i9.2.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Singh PK, Gohil RK, Saxena N. Limberg flap procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A prospective study. International Surgery Journal. 2017;4(7):2238.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
4.
Yogishwarappa C, Abhishek V. Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal sinus: International J of Biomed & Advanced Research. 2016;7(4):165-68. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v7i4.3184.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
5.
McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Chirurgie du sinus pilonidal: Plaie ouverte ou fermeture primaire? Résultats d’une méta-analyse. Journal de Chirurgie. 2008;145(6):612.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
6.
Aithal SK, Rajan CS, Reddy N. Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(4):298-301. Doi:10.1007/ s12262-012-0489-5.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Wolfe SA. Alexander A. Limberg MD. 1894-1974. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56(6):239-40. Doi: 10.1097/00006534-197508000-00099.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Tezel E. A new classification according to navicular area concept for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Colorectal Disease, 2007;9(6):575-76. Doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01236.x.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Singh M, Dalal S, Baleshwar, Raman S. Management of pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap: Our experience. International Surgery Journal. 2020;7(5):1575.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
10.
Humphries AE, James E. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(1):113-24.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Hosseini SV, Rezazadehkermani M, Roshanravan R, Gabash KM, Aghaie- Afshar M. Pilonidal disease: review of recent literature. Ann Colorectal Res. 2014;2:e19705. Doi: 10.17795/acr19705.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
12.
Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of limberg flap and karydakis flap surgery for the treatment of patients with pilonidal sinus disease: A single-blinded parallel randomized study. Annals of Coloproctology [Internet]. 2019:22;35(6):313-318. Doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.27.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Bali I, Aziret M, Sözen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, et al. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015;70(5):350-55. Doi:10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Gurer A, Gomceli I, Ozdogan M, Ozlem N, Sozen S, Aydin R. Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Karydakis flap operation? A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(9):1797-99.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Senthil Kumar K, Anantharamakrishnan R. Limberg transposition flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus- Our experience. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology. 2012;2(2): 95-97. ISSN 2277-2812 E-ISSN 2249-8109.   [Google Scholar]
16.
Boshnaq M, Phan YC, Martini I, Harilingam M, Akhtar M, Tsavellas G. Limberg flap in management of pilonidal sinus disease: Systematic review and a local experience. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2018;118(2):78-84.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Ates M, Dirican A, Sarac M, Aslan A, Colak C. Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: A prospective randomized study. The American Journal of Surgery. 2011;202(5):568-73.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: Prospective randomized study. International Surgery. 2015;100(5):870-77.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Majeed S. OUR experience of rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction in pilonidal sinus disease. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2019;7(3):561-65.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
20.
Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E, Akin M, Oguz M. Modified limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surgery Today. 2004;34(5):419-23.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Urhan MK, Kücükel F, Topgul K, Özer ?, Sari S. Rhomboid excision and limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2002;45(5):656-59.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Aslam MN, Shoaib S, Choudhry AM. Use of limberg flap for pilonidal sinus- A viable option. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009;21(4):31-33.   [Google Scholar]
23.
Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2013;18(1):29-37.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg. 2005;190(3):388-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.068.24.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
25.
Choudhry A, Choudhry A, Aslam K, Aslam H, Ali B, Hafeez A, et al. Factors influencing decision to obtain free or subsidized treatment of chronic hepatitis C with DAA’s in resource poor setting. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017;112:S530-31.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
26.
Özcan B, Ilkgül Ö. Contralateral Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal disease recurrence. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2019;42(8):787-91.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
27.
Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E, Nazli O, Onal MA. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1436-44.  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *