Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Site map
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Editorial Board
Editorial Statements
Editorial-PeerReview Process
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Ijars Performance
Journal Policy
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here Edit Register
Register For Article Submission
Login Here Logout
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJNMR
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2023 Month : November-December Volume : 12 Issue : 6 Page : SO08 - SO12 Full Version

Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study


Ainzin Maria Catherin, Y Shajahan, S Preetha, PB Vinod
1. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Government T D Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government T D Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government T D Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
\Dr. PB Vinod,
Vidhu Nivas, Reddiarvalappu, Sanathanapuram, Alappuzha-688003, Kerala, India.
E-mail: pbdrvinod@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is defined as an infection that occurs within an incisional wound within 30 days following the procedure. SSI continues to be a significant contributor to extended hospital stays and elevated morbidity, with significant mortality even with well-equipped operation theaters with modern sterilisation techniques, surgical equipment, proper antibiotic cover, and newer surgical methods. Proper identification of the risk factors and modification, if possible, is the only way to optimise surgical outcomes and reduce SSI.

Aim: To assess the incidence of SSI and analyse the risk factors associated with SSI.

Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2022 at a rural medical college in the coastal area of Alappuzha district of Kerala, India. Patients over 18 years of age admitted for elective Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery for various indications were included. Those presenting with pre-existing infections other than the indication for surgery and those undergoing laparoscopic surgeries were excluded. Operations were performed on the third day after admission for all patients. The incidence of SSI and its relation with age, gender, smoking, diabetes, preoperative serum albumin, White Blood Cell (WBC) count, type and duration of surgery, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and surgical wound were analysed using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results: On analysis of 216 patients, variables such as smoking, diabetes, preoperative low serum albumin, higher ASA physical status, contaminated and dirty wound, and prolonged duration of surgery were strongly associated with the development of SSI.

Conclusion: Patients with risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, preoperative low serum albumin, higher ASA physical status, contaminated and dirty wound, and prolonged duration of surgery should receive special attention to optimise surgical outcomes and mitigate the risk of infection.
Keywords : Contaminated wound, Duration of surgery, Serum albumin, Smoking
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2023/67462.2953

Date of Submission: Sep 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 23, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 28, 2023 (13%)

EMENDATIONS: 7

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
 
INTRODUCTION

Postoperative wound infection has long been one of the most serious complications in surgical practice. SSI is defined as an infection that occurs within an incisional wound within 30 days following the procedure (1). SSI, the most common postoperative complication, leads to pain and suffering (2),(3) and ranks among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections, occurring after 1-3% of all surgical procedures (4). Despite advances in operating room ventilation, sterilisation methods, surgical techniques, and antibiotic prophylaxis, SSI continues to be a major cause of prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity, and mortality, with a mortality rate of upto 3% (5). Patients with SSI are twice as likely to die, more likely to spend time in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and more than five times more likely to be readmitted to the hospital (6). Most studies indicate that SSIs are more common with abdominal surgery than other types of surgery (4),(7),(8),(9).

When SSI develops, management becomes more difficult due to costly antibiotics, prolonged hospital stays, and ICU admission, especially in patients in low socio-economic groups. Although many reports are available in the literature, studies among the population from coastal areas, attending rural medical colleges, are lacking. Hence, the study was conducted to assess the incidence of SSI and analyse the risk factors associated with SSI.
 
 
Material and Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted from March 2020 to March 2022 at a rural medical college in the coastal area of Alappuzha district in Kerala, India. Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) (EC/32/2020) approval was obtained. Patients were informed about the study in their native language, and written consent was obtained. The study included 216 patients.

Inclusion criteria: Patients over 18 years of age admitted for elective GI surgery for various indications and patients classified as ASA physical status Classes I to IV were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those presenting with pre-existing infections unrelated to the indication for surgery and those who underwent laparoscopic surgeries were excluded. Patients with prior abdominal surgery and those on immunosuppressive therapy, patients of Class V ASA was excluded from the study.

All consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Selected patients underwent preoperative investigations, preanaesthesia check-ups, and consultations with other departments before admission. Medications for other ailments, such as diabetes and hypertension, were initiated before admission. Study details were entered in a prestructured performa. The preoperative details included age, gender, smoking history, diabetes, preoperative serum albumin, preoperative WBC, ASA physical status (I to IV). The immediate postoperative details included the type of surgery (Upper GI/Lower GI), surgical wound class (clean/clean contaminated/contaminated), duration of surgery (≤120 minutes and >120 minutes). Data was collected until day 30. The duration of surgery was calculated using a timer set-up in the theatre, from the beginning of incision to the completion of surgery. The surgical wound class was assessed by the operating surgeon according to standard guidelines.

Operations were performed on the third day after admission. The night before surgery, the operative area was shaved, and on the day of surgery, patients were advised to shower in the morning. An intravenous injection of ceftriaxone (1 g) was administered to all patients one hour before the first incision.

Aseptic precautions were observed, including the use of autoclaved gowns, drapes, sterile gloves, and instruments. A standard surgical scrub was performed for six minutes before surgery for all patients. The operation area was painted with 5% povidone iodine, followed by methylated spirit. Basic surgical principles, such as minimal tissue handling and adequate hemostasis, were followed in all cases. Normal core temperature, oxygen saturation, and glycaemic control were maintained for all patients during surgery and the postoperative period, as per Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) guidelines for the prevention of SSI (10). Drains were used as necessary, and skin staples were used for skin closure. Povidone iodine was applied locally, and the wounds were covered with adhesive dressings.

Postoperatively, injections of ceftriaxone and metronidazole were administered. The wounds were inspected for signs of infection starting 48 hours after surgery until the eighth postoperative day. Daily inspections of the surgical site were conducted for swelling, erythema, local temperature changes, induration, purulent discharge, wound gaping, pain, and increased body temperature during this period. Patients were followed-up until the 30th postoperative day in the ward, outpatient clinic, or by telephone. Patient data were collected using a structured proforma. After surgery, patients were classified into clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty categories. The criteria for SSI were based on the definitions provided by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (11). The incidence and risk factors for SSI were analysed, considering variables such as age, gender, smoking history, diabetes, preoperative albumin levels, WBC counts, ASA score, type of surgery, surgical wound class, and duration of surgery.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were evaluated in terms of frequencies and percentages, while quantitative variables were assessed as means ± standard deviations. The prevalence of SSI was determined using a 95% Confidence Interval (CI). To identify associations between categorical variables, the Chi-square test was employed, and odds ratios with 95% CI were used to explain the occurrence of SSI with selected variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were entered into Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) spreadsheets, and statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
 
 
Results

Total 216 patients were included, among them, 37 patients (17.1%) developed SSIs. Out of the total, 186 patients (86.1%) were below 75 years of age, while 30 patients (13.9%) were 75 years or older (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

There were 165 non smokers and 51 smokers. Among the non smokers, 17 (10.3%) developed SSIs, whereas among the smokers, 20 (39.2%) developed SSIs. A significant association was found between smoking and SSIs. Among the 138 participants with serum albumin levels ≥3.5 g/dL, 18 (13%) developed SSIs, while among the 78 participants with levels <3.5 g/dL, 19 (24.4%) developed SSIs (Table/Fig 3).

Among the 81 patients who underwent upper GI surgery, 17 (21%) developed SSIs, and among the 135 who underwent lower GI surgery, 20 (14.8%) developed SSIs. This difference was not statistically significant, and no association was found between SSI and the site of surgery (Table/Fig 4).

Eighteen (8.3%) wounds were categorised as clean, 192 (88.9%) as clean-contaminated, and 6 (2.8%) as contaminated. Among the clean category of 18 patients, 2 (11.1%) patients developed SSI. Among the clean-contaminated category of 192 patients, 29 (15.1%) patients developed SSI. Among the contaminated category of six patients, all 6 (100%) developed SSI. The rate of SSI among clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds was 11.1%, 15.1%, and 100%, respectively. Present study analysis of clean cases alone, along with clean-contaminated and contaminated cases together, revealed a significant association with SSI (Table/Fig 5).
 
 
Discussion

In the present study, 37 out of 216 patients (17.1%) developed SSI, which was consistent with previously reported SSI rates. A multicentre cohort study conducted by the Global Surg Collaborative, investigating SSI after GI surgery across different income countries, found that SSIs affected 12.3% of patients globally, with the incidence increasing across income groups. In low-income countries, the incidence reached 39.8% among patients undergoing dirty surgery (12). In India, the reported incidence of SSI has varied between 5% and 24% in studies from different regions (13),(14).

Regarding age in present study, the statistical analysis revealed no significant association between the age groups and SSI. Present study findings align with other studies that concluded older age is not an independent risk factor for SSI (15),(16),(17),(18). Some studies have even shown that increasing age is associated with a decreased risk of SSI (19),(20),(21). A study by Kaye KS et al., revealed an increase in SSI up to the age of 65 years, followed by a decrease in the rate among older patients (22).

Present study found no statistically significant association between gender and SSI. Other studies have shown varying results. For example, Langelotz C et al., analysed data from the German Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KISS) and found that women had a lower rate of SSI after abdominal procedures compared to men (23). In contrast, a study by Lindsjö C et al., in a rural hospital in Ujjain, India, identified female gender as a risk factor for SSI (24).

Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between serum albumin levels and SSI (p-value <0.05). This finding was consistent with a study by Hennesey DB et al., where preoperative hypoalbuminemia was identified as an independent risk factor for SSI following GI surgery, leading to prolonged inpatient stays (25). Numerous studies have associated poor patient outcomes with hypoalbuminemia (26),(27).

No statistically significant association was found between preoperative WBC count and the risk of developing SSI, which aligns with the results of other studies. For example, Mahmood E et al., found no significant difference in the development of superficial and deep SSI based on preoperative WBC count (28). Tfaily MA et al., also demonstrated no relationship between preoperative WBC count and superficial and deep SSI (29).

In present study, a significant association was observed between diabetes and SSI. This was consistent with a systematic review and meta-analysis by Martin ET et al., which showed a pooled odds ratio of 1.61 for gynaecology, 1.16 for colorectal, and 1.58 for breast surgeries (30). A study conducted by Lindsjö C et al., in Ujjain, India, found that among 1.8% of diabetic patients in their cohort, seven individuals developed SSI with an odds ratio of 4.43 and a p-value of 0.005 (24).

Present study did not find a statistically significant association between the type of surgery and SSI. However, a slight increase in SSI following upper GI surgery was observed. The lower incidence of SSI associated with lower GI cases may be attributed to proper planned bowel preparation, targeted antibiotics against colonic bacteria, and the use of systemic antibiotics.

There was a statistically significant association between prolonged surgical duration and SSI. The duration of surgery is often considered an independent risk factor for SSI. Similar results were seen in a systematic review by Cheng H et al., which included 81 studies of variable duration. Three studies in their review had durations similar to our study (≤120 and >120 minutes) (31). One of the studies included was by Biscione FM et al., which had 6,892 patients. They reported a relative risk of 2.8 for long-duration surgery with a p-value of <0.001 (32). Another study by Anaya DA et al., included 503 patients, of which 263 underwent long-duration surgery. They found a significant association with SSI with a p-value of 0.001 (33). Davis GB et al., also reported similar findings in their study with 38,739 patients, where 891 patients developed SSI (2.3%), and long-duration surgery was identified as a significant risk factor (34). The pooled adjusted odds ratio for SSI among these three studies was 1.65 with a p-value of <0.00001.

There was also a statistically significant association between surgical wound class and SSI. Higher wound class was identified as a major risk factor, which was consistent with previous studies. For example, a study conducted in Turkey with 320 clean cases, 454 clean-contaminated cases, 174 contaminated cases, and 69 dirty cases found odds ratios for SSI of 1, 2.8, 3, and 10.7, respectively. The p-values for clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty cases were 0.009, 0.001, and 0.0006, respectively (35). Similarly, a Brazilian study involving 16,882 participants found odds ratios for SSI of 1.5, 2.7, and 2 for clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty cases, respectively. The p-values were p<0.001 for the first two categories and 0.001 for the third category (36).

Statistical analysis, considering ASA physical Class I, II, and a combined III/IV group, revealed a significant association between ASA physical status class and SSI as a postoperative outcome. Many similar studies have reported higher risks for SSI among patients classified as ASA III or IV. For example, Kaya E et al., conducted a study with ASA scores of 1 (N=300), 2 (N=564), 3 (N=127), and 4 (N=26). The percentages of SSI were 5%, 9.2%, 15.7%, and 11.5% with odds ratios of 1, 1.9, 3.5, and 2.4, respectively. The p-values were 0.03, 0.0004, and 0.175 for ASA scores 2, 3, and 4 (35).

Bhangu A et al., studied 7,339 participants from high-income countries, 3,918 from middle-income countries, and 1,282 from low-income countries. The odds ratios for ASA scores 2 and 3 were 1.44 and 1.63, respectively, with p-values of <0.001 for both groups (12).

In the present study, statistical analysis revealed a significant association between smoking and SSI, which was consistent with many other studies. Nolan MB et al., evaluated the influence of current smoking status on SSI and found an odds ratio of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.20-1.90; p-value <0.001) (37). Hawn MT et al., categorised 393,794 patients into never smoked (N=186,632), prior smoker (N=71,421), and current smoker (N=135,741). The percentages of SSI were 2.4%, 3.2%, and 3.4% with odds ratios (95% CI) of 1, 1.11, and 1.18, respectively (38).

Being a prospective study with a limited number of variables, authors were able to collect accurate and complete data. Since the study was conducted in a single centre, well-standardised outcome assessments were possible. These are considered to be the major strengths of this study.

Limitation(s)

Since the time period for detection SSI was upto 30 days, there was a chance that some SSIs developing after discharge may escape detection. It is generally believed that only healthy older individuals can undergo surgery with reasonable outcomes, and patients with good functional status are more likely to choose the surgical option. Additionally, the number of elderly patients in present study was limited.
 
 
Conclusion

This study has revealed an incidence of SSIs that was comparable to other findings. The research identified specific factors associated with a higher likelihood of SSI, including prolonged surgical procedures, contaminated surgical wounds, high ASA class, diabetes mellitus, low preoperative serum albumin, and smoking. Patients with these risk factors should receive special attention before, during, and after surgery to optimise surgical outcomes and mitigate the risk of infection.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Sungurtekin H, Sungurtekin U, Balci C, Zencir M, Erdem E. The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(3):227-32.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet [Internet]. 2011;377(9761):228-41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-32.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Azoury S, Eckhauser F, Farrow N, Hu Q, Soares K, Hicks C, et al. Postoperative abdominal wound infection-epidemiology, risk factors, identification, and management. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2015;2:137-48.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
5.
Awad SS. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and postoperative surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(4):234-37.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):270-76.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Emil A, Lital KB, Eithan A, Tamar M, Alia R, Faris N. Surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: Incidence and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Infect Dis (Auckl) [Internet]. 2015;47(11):761-67. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/23744235.2015.1055587.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Legesse Laloto T, Hiko Gemeda D, Abdella SH. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection in Ethiopia: Prospective cohort. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):01-09.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Mawalla B, Mshana SE, Chalya PL, Imirzalioglu C, Mahalu W. Predictors of surgical site infections among patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Surg. 2011;11:21.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Berriós-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784-91.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Dégbey C, Kpozehouen A, Coulibaly D, Chigblo P, Avakoudjo J, Ouendo EM, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with surgical site infections in the university clinics of traumatology and urology of the National University Hospital Centre Hubert Koutoukou Maga in Cotonou. Front Public Heal. 2021;9:629351.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Bhangu A, Ademuyiwa AO, Aguilera ML, Alexander P, Al-Saqqa SW, Borda- Luque G, et al. Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: A prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):516-25.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Pathak A, Saliba EA, Sharma S, Mahadik VK, Shah H, Lundborg CS. Incidence and factors associated with surgical site infections in a teaching hospital in Ujjain, India. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2014;42(1):e11-15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.06.013   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Kamat U, Ferreira A, Savio R, Motghare D. Antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial isolates in a teaching hospital in Goa. Indian J Community Med. 2008;33(2):89-92.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK, Gannon C, Napolitano LM. Surgical site infections: Reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res. 2002;103(1):89-95.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, Hay JM, Flamant Y. French Association for Surgical Research. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: A multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138(3):314-24.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Olsen MA, Lock-Buckley P, Hopkins D, Polish LB, Sundt TM, Fraser VJ. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(1):136-45.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Borger MA, Rao V, Weisel RD, Ivanov J, Cohen G, Scully HE, et al. Deep sternal wound infection: Risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(4 SUPPL.):1050-56.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Gómez-Ortega A, Sillero-Arenas M, Llorca J. Epidemiology of surgical-site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge a prospective cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22(1):24-30.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Byrne DJ, Lynch W, Napier A, Davey P, Malek M, Cuschieri A. Wound infection rates: The importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 1994;26(1):37-43.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Haley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH, Stanley RC, Emori TG, Hardison CD, et al. Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1976. Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med. 1981;70(4):947-59.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Kaye KS, Schmit K, Pieper C, Sloane R, Caughlan KF, Sexton DJ, et al. The effect of increasing age on the risk of surgical site infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(7):1056-62.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Langelotz C, Mueller-Rau C, Terziyski S, Rau B, Krannich A, Gastmeier P, et al. Gender-specific differences in surgical site infections: An analysis of 438,050 surgical procedures from the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Visz Gastrointest Med Surg. 2014;30(2):114-17.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Lindsjö C, Sharma M, Mahadik VK, Sharma S, Stålsby Lundborg C, Pathak A. Surgical site infections, occurrence, and risk factors, before and after an alcohol-based handrub intervention in a general surgical department in a rural hospital in Ujjain, India. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2015;43(11):1184-89. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.010.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
25.
Hennessey DB, Burke JP, Ni-Dhonochu T, Shields C, Winter DC, Mealy K. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent risk factor for the development of surgical site infection following gastrointestinal surgery: A multi-institutional study. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):325-29.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
26.
Lohsiriwat V, Chinswangwatanakul V, Lohsiriwat S, Akaraviputh T, Boonnuch W, Methasade A, et al. Hypoalbuminemia is a predictor of delayed postoperative bowel function and poor surgical outcomes in right-sided colon cancer patients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007;16(2):213-17.   [Google Scholar]
27.
Fuhrman MP, Charney P, Mueller CM. Hepatic proteins and nutrition assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(8):1258-64.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
28.
Mahmood E, Knio ZO, Mahmood F, Amir R, Shahul S, Mahmood B, et al. Preoperative asymptomatic leukocytosis and postoperative outcome in cardiac surgery patients. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):01-11.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
29.
Tfaily MA, Ghanem P, Farran SH, Dabdoub F, Kanafani ZA. The role of preoperative albumin and white blood cell count in surgical site infections following whipple surgery. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022;12(1):01-08. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21849-2.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
30.
Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C, Nguyen H, Santarossa M, Evans R, et al. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(1):88-99.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
31.
Cheng H, Chen BPH, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: A systematic review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18(6):722-35.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
32.
Biscione FM, Couto RC, Pedrosa TM, Neto MC. Factors influencing the risk of surgical site infection following diagnostic exploration of the abdominal cavity. J Infect. 2007;55(4):317-23.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
33.
Anaya DA, Cormier JN, Xing Y, Koller P, Gaido L, Hadfield D, et al. Development and validation of a novel stratification tool for identifying cancer patients at increased risk of surgical site infection. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):134-39.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
34.
Davis GB, Peric M, Chan LS, Wong AK, Sener SF. Identifying risk factors for surgical site infections in mastectomy patients using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2013;205(2):194-99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.007.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
35.
Kaya E, Yetim I, Dervisoglu A, Sunbul M, Bek Y. Risk factors for and effect of a one-year surveillance program on surgical site infection at a University Hospital in Turkey. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7(6):519-26.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
36.
Carvalho RLR, Campos CC, Franco LM de C, Rocha A de M, Ercole FF. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection in general surgeries. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:e2848.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
37.
Nolan MB, Martin DP, Thompson R, Schroeder DR, Hanson AC, Warner DO. Association between smoking status, preoperative exhaled carbon monoxide levels, and postoperative surgical site infection in patients undergoing elective surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(5):476-83.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
38.
Hawn MT, Houston TK, Campagna EJ, Graham LA, Singh J, Bishop M, et al. The attributable risk of smoking on surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):914-20.  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Author Support  |  Submit Manuscript  |  IJARS Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
©INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANATOMY RADIOLOGY & SURGERY (IJARS), ISSN : 2277-8543.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 1/9, Roop Nagar, Delhi 11000. Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *